I’ve found some old stories that shed some light on why Paula Wagner ultimately left as Chief Exec. at MGM/UA:
Wagner to split from MGM
Paula Wagner is in talks to leave Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s United Artists label after falling out with the Hollywood studio over the financing and independence of the company.
Ms Wagner and Tom Cruise, her production partner, joined UA almost two years ago after the Hollywood star was fired by Paramount Pictures.
Harry Sloan, MGM’s chairman, gave the pair an equity stake in UA and autonomy to “green light” their own movies. The aim of the deal was to revive MGM and the historic UA label by bringing in two of Hollywood’s biggest names. The move was meant to prove to sceptical observers that Mr Sloan meant business with his plans to turn round MGM, which had fallen behind rival studios and scaled back its production business.
Ms Wagner and Mr Cruise were promised complete autonomy by MGM but the marriage has failed. UA executives hired by Ms Wagner have recently departed the company, apparently at the behest of MGM, which has caused friction.
Other senior executives have also been hired, which has caused a further deterioration in relations between Ms Wagner and Mr Sloan.
In addition, MGM has failed to raise financing to fund its own production slate. UA succeeded in raising $500m in a deal arranged by Merrill Lynch but although the money was to be used exclusively to fund UA movies there have been internal disagreements about whether the money can be spent on MGM films.
These tensions have stalled UA’s own plans, said a person familiar with the situation. Ms Wagner declined to comment. However, the person familiar with the situation said she planned to return to full-time movie production.
MGM also declined to comment. The studio came close to securing its own production fund last year but the plans were hit by the onset of the credit crunch.
Since then the company, which is owned by Texas Pacific Group and Providence Equity Partners, has also held negotiations with Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity Media group about a co-financing deal for several MGM films.
Mr Cruise and Ms Wagner will keep their equity stakes in UA. But Ms Wagner will leave her executive role after finishing post-production on Valkyrie , a second world war drama starring Mr Cruise. (ft.com, August 14, 2008)
Tom Cruise’s Production Partner Bows Out
Tom Cruise’s longtime production partner, Paula Wagner, has announced that she is leaving her chief executive post at the new United Artists to pursue projects independently.
She will retain her coownership in UA, the nearly century-old studio that she and Cruise revived after losing their spot on the Paramount lot in 2006, and she’ll continue to work on her films that are already in the pipeline.
“I love Paula—we have worked together and been friends for over 25 years,” Cruise said in a statement Thursday. “I support her in anything she does. Paula is an incredibly smart and talented producer, and I look forward to working together producing films in the future.”
“I’ve truly relished working with my longtime partner Tom Cruise to revitalize United Artists, and I am proud of all that we’ve accomplished in the past two years, reinvigorating the brand and developing such a strong slate of films,” Wagner said in a statement Wednesday.
Wagner owns the UA shingle with Cruise, whose role at the company isn’t expected to be affected, and MGM.
“As much as I’ve enjoyed my time as an executive, I have longed to return to my true love, which is making movies, so that’s what I’ve decided to do,” her statement continued. “I still believe in our vision for UA, and I am confident that [MGM CEO] Harry Sloan and our colleagues at MGM will see that vision through to reality.”
Per Variety, she is expected to step down following the Dec. 26 release of Bryan Singer’s trouble-plagued World War II thriller, Valkyrie.
“This was very hard for Tom. Everyone recognized that Paula has been a disaster. But to his credit, he wanted her to have an exit with honor,” a source told L.A. Weekly’s Deadline Hollywood blog, which predicted the shakeup on Monday.
The “disaster” claim was in reference to the production problems plaguing Valkyrie and the box-office flop that was UA’s first effort, Lion for Lambs, both misfires that were rumored to be affecting the company’s financing deals. (E! Online, August 13, 2008)
So… It seems to me Paula only left after unforseen problems with not making enough money for UA, according to Mr Sloan, and that she will continue to work with Tom for C/W Productions.
4 Comments to “What caused Paula Wagner to leave UA as Chief Exec.”
ChrisREvans
David Boreanaz
Julia Stiles
Kate Beckinsale
Kate Hudson
Katie-Holmes.org
Rooney Mara Daily
Tim Burton fansite
Twilight-Media.net
More | Become one























Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol
Rock of Ages
One Shot
michelle says:
Yeah Chantal , but it seems to me, judgeing by the first artical and others Ive read , that the “unforseen problems with not making enough money” might just be a convienent excuse Sloan is useing.
It seen that Sloan needs UA’s Merrill Lynch money because he’s getting desperate for financeing . Sloan however can’t get ahold of the cash he desperately needs with Paula and Tom as co-owners in the way.
It seems once Sloan realised that Paula who was in charge of the money wasn’t going to let him have access to the cash, he started to make things difficult for her in order to drive her out.
michelle says:
It seems to me by the first artical and by others I’ve read that the “Paula didn’t do her job properly” or “she didn’t make enough money” reasons given could just be a rather convienent excuse for sloan.
It seems like he’s desperate for financeing and needs to get his hands on UA’s Merrill Lynch money. Paula wasn’t just going to hand it over, so he started to do everything he could to force her out.
Now the critisisem against Paula might have merit and may even be true, who knows, but I doubt it would be such a big issue right now and be used so viciously if Sloan didn’t desperately need her out in order to get that cash.
michelle says:
The she ” didn’t do her job properly ” and ” she didn’t make enough money ” critisisems against Paula may well be true and justified , who knows. It just seems funny to me though that these accusations and the viciousness of them have occured right when Sloan is desperate for financeing and is rumored to be desperately needing UA’s Merrill Lynch money.
michelle says:
Whether or not the criticisems against Paula are true or not ..who knows.
It just seems rather convienent that Paula it seems is being forced out when Sloan is reported to be desperate for financeing and needs UA’s Merril Lynch money, which he couldn’t get with Paula at the helm.